Booboos

How can you stop going wrong?

Mistakes are evaluated based on governing rules. It's like taking a checklist out of a catalogue and crossing each item against observed behavior. However, mistakenness are more crucially justified against subjectivity.

Making her stay longer will likely to create more booboos.

Why? According to her observations, her failures are innate and cannot be improved by further training. Well, I think her dislikeness to her are also innate and cannot be improved by giving her more chances to prove herself.

Truth is, she was forced to leave not due to her failure to accord with the rules, but because she failed to make her like her. You can't merely say "just because"; you have to say 'it is because".

Of course, you won't be surprised to know that she was also forced to undertake a pretensious legal exit, to cover up other people's assess that she is not even returning favor with.

***

How can institutions be filled with booboos: booboo actors, booboo arena, booboo lifespan?

Who are the real booboos, by the way? The queen, the minister, or the pawn?

Pawns are purposed to be stupid; if they are not stupid, then they won't be pawns. In fairness to the institutions, it is capable of identifying who should be pawns, ministers and queens. Pawns may be nice people, but they are because they have to. More importantly, they have the least to loose. Who cares if they got out of here? Pawns only horizontally slide and have no chances to crash vertically.

Conversely, queens are queens because they are the smartass; they cannot be there without being one. They might be ministers before; more surprisingly, they were the early pawns, but as I said, they are smartass; they are capable of doing something stupid without a soul figuring out. Unfortunately, a society will most quickly die without them.

My problem with the ministers is that they are petty-bourgeois. Charecteristically, they can be the best social climber in town and the worst power grabbers imagined. They perceive themselves larger than they are. They don't even own anything. So little power for too much opportunism. They are to so-so's. True, they are indeed smarter than the pawns, but they are one hell of airheads. I'd rather admit stupidity and poverty than deny both, despite truthfully having both.

***

So, it's really a management problem. If she is stupid, then the management is so lame that they hire stupid employees. If the other one is a braggart and primadonna that she is too sensitive to encounter the slightest stupidity, then the management must look for applicants that qualify her standards. For the nth time that the braggart have dumped applicants, the worst thing that the management can do is to venture into a shortcut, an easy-way-out solution, which, very unfortunately for me, is to order the only person who can handle that braggart, take an indefinite (and unpaid) double job and take all the consequences of their incompetent management system. Booboos.